The writer makes use of the phrases ‘perpetrators and victims’ and describes the masturbators as ‘very awful people’ (Zia, 2017). In a time when sex discourse flourishes and companies routinely paint their logotypes in rainbow colours to profit on a sexually liberal image, it seems that the worst sin is to easily be alone. Despite the significance of understanding all features of being human, porno; pornopov.com, analysis on sexuality is usually seen as ‘dirty work’ (Irvine, 2014: 633), and researchers, not least of sexually specific comics, are vulnerable to accusations of having a ‘prurient’ interest in their research topic (Madill, 2018: 270); studying lolicon made Patrick W. Galbraith (2017) ‘the lolicon guy’, publishing a seminal book on pornographic films turned Linda Williams (1999: ix) into ‘a professor of “porn”’, and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (2008: 59) felt the need to justify why she, as a lady, wrote about gay men. The erotic in research ranges from recognizing it as a benevolent influence in education (Pensoneau-Conway, 2009: 176) to anthropologists having sex with analysis contributors so as to grasp a certain practice, corresponding to nameless intercourse (Langarita Adiego, 2019: 1256). While there may be plenty of literature on masturbation as such, few researchers write about their very own masturbation habits.
Group Admins
Create an Album
